Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > yes this was the first thing i proposed in my previous patch. the second > > one was the possibility to insert branch inset (not only the branch) > > directly into the document. > > > > if somebody wants to create branch in 90% cases he wants to put it > > immediately into the text. > > This would be possible as well. But I'd rather define a separate lfun for > this.
so you would agree if i added new lfun, say lfun-branch-add-insert which would do the same as "branch-add branch_inset_insert" in my previous proposal ? pavel
