Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bj�nnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
| Lars> the function?
|
| I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments
| of the function so that there type can be checked by dispatch, and the
| the func would use string_arg[1], int_arg[2] and the code would check
| the function uses the arguments in the way it declared it should.
|
| Maybe it is not useful, after all. Or too complicated for what it
| provides. Anyway, I think we should not need tests at the beginning of
| each function.
One other idea togeter with this is to have all the lyxfuncs
dynamically loadable...
then we can use the name of the lyxfunc as name of the dynamic
loadable object and pass just the required number of args each time...
type t = ldopen(lyxaction.name(LFUN_BUFFER_NEW));
t(arg1, arg2, arg3);
or similar (we can have the dynamic loadable objects linked into lyx)
Lgb
