LyXAction.cpp Question

[rgheck]

Not that it's a big deal, but it seems a bit of a waste to have both 
lyx_func_map and lyx_info_map here, since lyx_info_map actually contains 
the info that lyx_func_map does. The changes needed if we eliminate 
lyx_func_map seem pretty minor, too. Anyone know of a reason not to do this?

I think maybe the reason we have both of these has to do with some 
distinction between "real" and "pseudo" actions that used to exist in 
the LyX code. But, unless I'm mistaken, there doesn't seem to be any 
such distinction any more.

rh