Stephan Witt wrote: > Thank you, better indeed. > > I made an attempt to really compute a SVN::isRevertWithConfirmation() result. > I used "svn status" to substitute "svn diff" - this should be cheaper. > The isModified() helper method can be used for > SVN::isCheckInWithConfirmation() too. > > Does this make sense?
i was reconciled with the fact revert confirmation remains as it was since the whole machinery looks like a bloat. it makes sense with committing which you use ten times a day, but i can hardly remember when i used reversal. also when using it i always want to see diff, so going to commandline anyway... secondly i guess that you can't use svn status without parsing (non empty != modified) its output so it maybe cheaper in terms of CPU but not in code complexity. pavel
