Hi all,
Now that 2.0.0 tries to guess the number of numbered equations, rather than than displaying (#) as 1.6.x does, should I file bugs in trac for the cases it gets wrong? Sorry I didn't spot these earlier in the cycle, I normally have instant preview turned on (where equation numbering has always been random), so I only found out about the new feature from bug #7493. Here are the bugs that I've spotted: * In report, book and maybe other classes, equations are numbered with no suffix ( (1), (2), ...) up until the first \chapter, after which they are numbered per chapter ( (1.1), (1.2), ...). In LyX they always show up with no suffix regardless. * If a child document has numbered equations, then equations in the master document do not skip at all to take this into account. The behaviour of the equation numbers in the child document is particularly strange: every key stroke increments them all! * If the user has an explicit \tag or \tag*, then this is ignored. At the very least, the numbering should never skip because of an equation with an explicit tag in it. Better would be if the tag is displayed (and, even better, edited!) in place of the equation number. * Subequations, and thus equations after them, are not numbered correctly. Since subequations currently require ERT or a custom module, this is an enhancement request rather than a bug (but has support on the user vote page). Jim
