Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2011 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > Am 04.05.2011 02:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > What is the reason you still use scons ? > > Because it works ;-). > I also have CMake but cannot see any difference in the compiling speed > between CMake and SCons. > SCons has the advantage that I can also remerge po-files. Maybe that is now > also possible with > CMake. If so, please tell me how this is dome.
This is easy, normally all the created po-files are in the build-directory.
Simply copy them to source and you are done.
To creat layouttranslations, the target is "layouttranslations1"
> Besides this, should we kill SCons for LyX 2.1 and the 2.0 branch? (I'm not
> opposed.)
> Until this is not decided I prefer to have a working SCons.
>
> regards Uwe
>
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
