On 05/09/2011 02:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> Both of those look fine to me. > OK, I'll put them in. The next po remerge will then create some "new old" > strings. > Thanks.
>> I'm going to look at the other mathed ones, too. It seems prima facie as >> if they will be good for branch at some point, but (a) I'm hoping to >> release 2.0.1 not that far into the future, since we already have some >> pretty serious bugs fixed, and (b) these look like fairly minor bugs >> that could wait for 2.0.2. > Most users won't notice, but those who use \utilde or \undertilde would > probably like it. I have no strong opinion on this. > >> If that's true, would you mind adding them to trac with 2.0.x >> milestones, if they are not there? > If you want them for 2.0 I'd like to put them in now. This is less work, and > the risk is close to zero (I have done exactly the same sort of changes in > older stable versions), so why wait? > If you're confident about this, then they can go in now. Richard
