André Pönitz <andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> writes:
| On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:27:40AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> André Pönitz <andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> writes:
>>
>> | On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:14:42PM +0200, lar...@gullik.org wrote:
>> >> From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes <lar...@gullik.org>
>> >>
>> >> Use a local typedef pair<string, string> P to avoid having to repeat
>> >> that multiple times.
>> >> ---
>> >> src/lyxfind.cpp | 72
>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>> >> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/src/lyxfind.cpp b/src/lyxfind.cpp
>> >> index a19724b..33dbd8a 100644
>> >> --- a/src/lyxfind.cpp
>> >> +++ b/src/lyxfind.cpp
>> >> @@ -495,54 +495,62 @@ typedef vector<pair<string, string> > Escapes;
>> >> /// @note Beware of order
>> >> Escapes const & get_regexp_escapes()
>> >> {
>> >> + typedef std::pair<std::string, std::string> P;
>> >> +
>> >
>> | Conveniently adding a std:: or three, so next time the discussion
>> | comes up we can reasonably claim that it is used "inconsistently"
>> | and the 'using' on top could go...
>>
>> What is your agenda really?
>
| Preventing attempts to turn the LyX code base into a guinea pig for
| programming experiments again. Especially the kind of experiment that
| add a burden for others.
Since you are not doing any, perhaps you should let those that do
decide? I am not going to push anything without a +1 anyway.
--
Lgb
