Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 02:18 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> I think using 4.5 as baseline would be very safe and allow for code
>>> simplification.
>> Anyone against this?
>>
> I know there are sometimes issues with cygwin, so we should wait to hear 
> about that. But it's clear that a lot of this could go, then:

IIRC cygwin ships Qt >= 4.5 for a long time.
Pavel

Reply via email to