Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/28/2012 02:18 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> I think using 4.5 as baseline would be very safe and allow for code >>> simplification. >> Anyone against this? >> > I know there are sometimes issues with cygwin, so we should wait to hear > about that. But it's clear that a lot of this could go, then:
IIRC cygwin ships Qt >= 4.5 for a long time. Pavel