On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2012 um 23:30:08, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta
> <tomm...@lyx.org>
>
>> On 13/12/12 12:33, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> > Checking findadv-08-in.txt (Shouldn't we better create 3 logs here?)
>
>>
>
>> That's possible/useful, sure. Feel free to apply modifications.
>
>
>
> Did it locally now.
>
>
>
>> This is one of a few test cases where I had to increase the typing delay
>> (KD: 200).
>
>> I just verified that commenting out that line the test fails, as it
>> doesn't seem to
>
>> manage to check the needed option properly. As a rough guess, it seems
>> like the GUI
>
>> manages to execute the [Enter] action before finishing the Alt+l, Alt+r
>> actions
>
>> that are dispatched before -- increasing the waiting time there, fixed the
>> issue.
>
>> Though, there are a few cases in which this problem returns, and depending
>> on the
>
>> hardware and/or WM options, some of these tests may unnecessarily fail.
>
>> Sometimes, repeating the failing test leads to passing it, but I
>> understand it's
>
>> not optimum.
>
>
>
> It does not help here. There is something fishy ... let me explain.
>
>
>
> The second part of findadv-08 test searches for 'Putting.*par 1' but here
> the string is 'Putting.*par 2'
>
> If I change it to search for 'Putting.*par 2', the string is 'Putting.*par
> 1'
>
> If I change to search for 'Putting.*par [12]', the string is 'Putting.*par
> 3'
>
>
>
> it works ONLY, if I set the search string to 'Putting.*par [123]'. The
> string in log-file is from this moment
>
> always 'par 3'.
>
>
>
> Something I don't understand is, why in the log appears 'Starting LyX . . .'
> 9 times, (should it not be 3 times?)
>
> Env{MAX_LOOP} is set to 1 after all.
>
> Ooooh shit, it should be 'MAX_LOOPS'
>
>
>
> Now it works! And the test is faster! Phew!
>
>
>
>> As u said, till it's just me, but if there's at least someone else, and it
>> becomes
>
>> integrated in a standard testing process, then I'd like to fix these
>> issues.
>
>>
>
>> Can u pls try the attached test out ?
>
>>
>
>> > P.S.
>
>> >
>
>> > Sorry if the private mail is not what you prefer here, but as we are ATM
>> > the only persons
>
>>
>
>> Yes, perhaps someone else gets curious and volunteers to help writing a
>> couple of further tests.
>
>
>
> Testing may not be so exciting for everyone, I know.
>
>
>
>> T.
>Kornel, did you get all of the advanced find tests passing? I am still having the failures I mentioned in the other email. Thanks, Scott
