Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > > commit 215042720c04e430807b044ef89ff87c3e393ba9 > > Author: Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> > > Date: Fri Feb 22 14:33:56 2013 -0800 > > > > Fix broken installation (typo, already fixed in 1e44661fa04896036d9). > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458692 > > > > diff --git a/lib/Makefile.am b/lib/Makefile.am > > index 423fa61..f00fa73 100644 > > --- a/lib/Makefile.am > > +++ b/lib/Makefile.am > > @@ -1635,6 +1635,6 @@ dist_ui_DATA = \ > > > > install-data-hook: > > $(CHMOD) 755 $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdatadir)/configure.py > > - for i in $(scriptdir)/*.py ; do \ > > + for i in $(scriptsdir)/*.py ; do \ > > $(CHMOD) 755 $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdatadir)/$$i; \ > > done > > In bash, if "set -u" is put at the top of a script, unbound variables > cause an error. Is there something like this that could be put in > Makefile.am? Or can an option be specified when calling Makefile.am? > If so, is there any reason not to do this? > > I have the same question for CMake. I remember that there was a > similar variable typo at some point.
a-ou, it actually doesn't work in working environment when you fix the typo; no time to inspect more, so i'll revert. make[4]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-office/lyx-2.0.98/work/var/tmp/portage/app-office/lyx-2 .0.98/work/lyx-2.0.98/lib' chmod 755 /var/tmp/portage/app-office/lyx-2.0.98/image//usr/share/lyx/configure.py for i in /usr/share/lyx/scripts/*.py ; do \ chmod 755 /var/tmp/portage/app-office/lyx-2.0.98/image//usr/share/lyx/$i; \ done chmod: cannot access '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/lyx-2.0.98/image//usr/share/lyx//usr/share/lyx/scripts/ clean_dvi.py': No such file or directory (no worry worry about "98", just temporary build) Richard, sorry to mess-up with the branch. Pavel
