Op 27-3-2013 16:00, Richard Heck schreef:
On 03/26/2013 08:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Csikos Bela <bcsikos...@freemail.hu>
wrote:
Hello:
I guess this is a bug in lyx 2.0.5:
When a subscript (\textsubscript) or superscript (\textsuperscript)
character is inserted in a text that has different font size than
default, the size of the sub- or superscript character is incorrect
in the output; it has the same size as text. This occurs if the sub-
or superscript character is inserted in a text (that has different
font size than default) afterwards. If the text including the sub-
or superscript character is written in normal size and the font size
is changed subsequently (by selecting text including the sub- or
superscript character and changing size), the sizes are correct.
See the attached lyx example and the corresponding pdf output.
Hi bcsikos,
Was this addressed? I don't know enough to know if this is a bug. If
no one else chimes in, please post a ticket on
http://www.lyx.org/trac/
Also note that emails regarding bug reports should be sent to the
developers list.
This got reported as #8610. The problem is that we are generating some
default CSS for this inset, and we are doing that because the font is
set by default, in the InsetLayout constructor, to sane_font, which
specifies values for everything. If I add
Font
EndFont
to the Script:superscript InsetLayout declaration, then things work
fine, since this sets effectively sets the font to inherit_font.
That seems like the right thing to me: that, by default, an
InsetLayout should get an "empty" font that does not do anything, not
a fully specified font that resets everything. Yes?
I.e., I am proposing:
diff --git a/src/insets/InsetLayout.cpp b/src/insets/InsetLayout.cpp
index 7729485..aa35f50 100644
--- a/src/insets/InsetLayout.cpp
+++ b/src/insets/InsetLayout.cpp
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ namespace lyx {
InsetLayout::InsetLayout() :
name_(from_ascii("undefined")), lyxtype_(STANDARD),
labelstring_(from_ascii("UNDEFINED")), contentaslabel_(false),
- decoration_(DEFAULT), latextype_(NOLATEXTYPE), font_(sane_font),
+ decoration_(DEFAULT), latextype_(NOLATEXTYPE), font_(inherit_font),
labelfont_(sane_font), bgcolor_(Color_error),
htmlforcecss_ (false), htmlisblock_(true),
multipar_(true), custompars_(true), forceplain_(false),
Richard
I didn't look at whether the change is good, but I am wondering whether
you just did not commit it, or whether you've retracted your proposal ?
Vincent
