> > Is this for branch 2.0.x or for master? Indeed it seems that the Qt5 > porting missed the Q_WS_xx defines, that need to be reevaluated one by one. > Vincent, what is your take on this? > > I indeed read that the Q_WS_* defines were replaced, but at the same time, it still seemed to work so I assumed that magic helped us here.
I will investigate further. Vincent
