Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:48:48, schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>
> Am Samstag, 1. März 2014 um 11:27:05, schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski 
> <benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr>
> > Here is a patch following this strategy, and an update patch for bug #8925 
> > - http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8925
> > 
> > Benjamin
> > 0006-Qt5-support-for-Mac.patch
> > 
> > 0007-Fix-bug-8925-menubar-not-displayed-in-Mac-OS-10.9.patch
> > 
> > On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:23 , Benjamin Piwowarski 
> > <benjamin.piwowar...@lip6.fr> wrote:
> > 
> 
> I could not find where the needed vars (LYX_QT_...) are defined.

OK, I overview qt_platforms.h.
 
> > > On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >>>> I can't comment on the cmake part, but the C++ changes look good. To 
> > >>>> our
> > >>>> Mac expperts: Is there any reason why they are not already in?
> > >>> I guess this is because since QT_WS_MACX was not defined anymore in QT5,
> > >>> the mac specific parts were not compiled anymore and hence did not 
> > >>> trigger
> > >>> any problem.
> > >> 
> > >> I researched a bit, and there are indeed subtle differences: Q_OS_MACX 
> > >> is 
> > >> also provided on the oldest qt release supported by LyX (4.5.0). 
> > >> However, 
> > >> with qt 4.x, Q_OS_MACX is not equivalent to Q_WS_MACX: If you build for 
> > >> X11 
> > >> you get Q_WS_X11 and Q_OS_MACX.
> > >> 
> > >> BTW, the other macros we use (Q_WS_WIN and Q_WS_X11) have no direct Q_OS 
> > >> equivalent either, but they need to be changed as well in qt5. I don't 
> > >> know 
> > >> where to go from here. AFAIK Vincent did compile already for windows 
> > >> with 
> > >> qt5. Why did that work without the changed macros? Also, the qt sources 
> > >> themselves still use the Q_WS macros, although I could not find any 
> > >> place 
> > >> where they are defined. Is that simply broken code? I can't believe. 
> > >> Should 
> > >> we define our own and not use the QT ones?
> > > 
> > > It seems that it would be better to have LyX macros handling the 
> > > following cases:
> > > - QT + OS X  => LYX_QT_OSX
> > > - QT5 + OS X => LYX_QT5_OSX
> > > - QT4 + OS X => LYX_QT4_OSX
> > > - QT4 + OS X + COCOA => LYX_QT_OSX_COCOA
> > > - QT4 + OS X + X11 => LYX_QT_OSX_X11
> > > 
> > > this would make the code more readable and easier to maintain IMHO. 
> > > 
> > > I can update my patch in this direction if needed. In that case, where 
> > > should I put the macro definitions?
> 
> Ah, OK. How about 'development/cmake/modules/LyXQT_OSX_Vars.cmake'?
> 
> > > Benjamin
> > 
        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to