Guillaume Munch wrote: > I hope I did not put you on a wrong track with my reference to the gcc-5 > bug, which was more of a joke (because the the conditions to trigger it > were *the contrary*).
No problem. It made me think a bit, but I did not waist any time. > It displays more resemblance with the kind of bugs > with math macros fixed by Enrico recently. To be sure, I tried in c++98 > mode and it crashes as well. I think it is useless to try with gcc-5 > now. Or do you still want me to? No. > Let's be nervous from now on when making changes to mathed/. > > I archive this in a bug report? Yes please. Georg
