Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:51:51, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 07:28:47PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015 um 14:04:48, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > <skost...@lyx.org> > > > a good guess is that you have a TeX Live that is more updated than mine. > > > I have intentionally not updated my TeX Live because I wanted to wait > > > until we had 0 test failures and then update TeX Live (holding fixed the > > > LyX hash I tested at) to see what changes. I'm not sure if that day will > > > come though so perhaps I should update also. > > > > > > In your commit message with regards to ectaart can you reference commit > > > 8a4c9b6 and put that we think the reason these exports started passing > > > is because of your updated LuaTeX version? Put what LuaTeX your version > > > is as the "good" version and mine as the "bad" version: > > > > > > Version beta-0.80.0 (TeX Live 2015) (rev 5238) > > > > Interesting, I have the same version. So it may be some new luainputenc.sty > > and/or ectaart.cls. > > But luainputenc.sty and ectaart.cls did not change at least from TL2013. > > > > > Do you think your TeX Live update broken any non-inverted tests? > > > > I don't think so. > > Good. > > > > This is good news. > > > > Now I am confused, what else may be the difference between our > > installations? > > Probably several other package versions. We can compare our LaTeX logs, > but I'm not sure it's worth the time.
We can do it outside of this list IMHO.
> I think it would be worth the time
> if an export went from successful to failing. But if you are curious I
> do not mind at all.
>
> In any case, once I update TeX Live (soon), I will be able to confirm
> that it was a package update.
Last time I updated was oct 16 11:22 MET.
ATM (got with tlmgr update --list) I see about 60 packages waiting for update.
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
