On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59:09AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 14.11.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > Dear all, > > > > If you have time, please download the LyX 2.2.0alpha1 tar and test that > > it compiles/installs as expected. It is located here: > > > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha1/ > > > > Also if you can, please check that it verifies correctly. This is my > > first time signing a tar ball. > > The signature is ok. The build on Mac OS X works.
Thanks for checking these. > I've uploaded the result here: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.2.0alpha1%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.2.0alpha1%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg.sig > > I've used Qt 5.5.1 to build it. Good choice. The key you used to sign expired a year and a half ago: $ gpg --verify *sig gpg: assuming signed data in `LyX-2.2.0alpha1+qt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg' gpg: Signature made Mon 16 Nov 2015 04:09:30 AM EST using RSA key ID EE614DC4 gpg: Good signature from "LyX on Mac OS X (Signing LyX disk images) <sw...@lyx.org>" gpg: Note: This key has expired! Primary key fingerprint: 4154 4A61 DBB7 7561 47C1 DD4F A149 7996 EE61 4DC4 $ Is this a problem? I imagine it is not a problem for alpha, and that I should go ahead and upload your .dmg but I wanted to check first. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
