Am 15.02.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Just an update for those who have not been following the other
conversations, and also a question:

beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
formally released it because we are still trying to make it so that it
is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There
is a problem with extracting the tar on Windows, so I have just sent Uwe
a zip file containing the same files that the tar contains.

If the zip file extracts correctly and Uwe can compile for Windows, does
this mean that we should release beta2 as long as we post the zip file
and in the email announcement we recommend the zip file if compiling on
Windows? Or because the tar has issues with being extracted on Windows,
we must move to beta3 which hopefully (still not confirmed) would
produce a tar that can be extracted correctly with the Windows build? A
separate question is does it matter that the 'make lyxdist' command for
beta2 did not produce the zip file that would be posted as beta2?

It seems to me that although it is indicative of an inexperienced
release manager, the best thing would be to move to beta3, and confirm
with Uwe before posting the files that the archive can be extracted and
that the Windows build succeeds. I don't have a strong opinion on this
though.

On a separate note, master branch is open. Depending on the above
discussion we might move very soon to beta3, so please nothing
non-trivial.

Scott


I would say: release tag 2.2.0beta2.
There is only the problem with untaring on Windows

For beta3:

- add zip to lyxdist
- some cleanup in boost

Peter

Reply via email to