On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:39:59PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 13. März 2016 um 11:13:32, schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net> > > Hallo Scott, > > > > On 2016-03-13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > The number of ctest failures for me went from 107 to 228 on a recent > > > tlmgr update that updated from package revision 39840 to 39991. > > > > And I thought we had the failures down to 0! What went wrong?
Well I still run the tests that are "UNRELIABLE". I just don't pay as
much attention to them as I do to other tests. Also, there are the 11
tests that are still failing that I had sent an email about a couple of
weeks ago, that have to do with #8035. Perhaps we should mark them as
UNRELIABLE now? And then there are other tests that are failing that I
would look into but haven't spent the time to do so yet.
> > > I also attach my tlmgr update log, in case it is of interest.
> >
> > The really interesting thing would be an error log!
Agreed, but it takes time to provide an error log for each failing test
(I think we have a feature request to improve this). I first wanted to
ask to see if others can reproduce before diving in to potential causes.
> > Do you see the pattern? It's something with luatex and fontspec.
> >
> > The interesting question would be: are there "(dvi3|pdf5)_systemF" tests
> > that do not fail except the following?
> > Which?
OK I will look into this.
> > > 1010:INVERTED.MANUALS.TODO_export/doc/es/UserGuide_dvi3_systemF
> > > 1015:INVERTED.MANUALS.TODO_export/doc/es/UserGuide_pdf4_systemF
> > > 1017:INVERTED.MANUALS.TODO_export/doc/es/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF
> >
> > Is the output OK here?
>
> Looks good.
>
> >
> > > 1915:EXAMPLES_export/examples/aas_sample_dvi
> > > 1918:EXAMPLES_export/examples/aas_sample_pdf
> > > 1919:EXAMPLES_export/examples/aas_sample_pdf2
> > > 1920:EXAMPLES_export/examples/aas_sample_pdf3
> > > 1921:EXAMPLES_export/examples/aas_sample_pdf4_texF
> > > 1922:EXAMPLES_export/examples/aas_sample_pdf4_systemF
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > 4446:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_dvi
> > > 4447:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_dvi3_texF
> > > 4448:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_dvi3_systemF
> > > 4449:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf
> > > 4450:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf2
> > > 4451:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf3
> > > 4452:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf4_texF
> > > 4453:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf4_systemF
> > > 4454:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf5_texF
> > > 4455:TEMPLATES_export/templates/aastex_pdf5_systemF
> >
> > This seems to be an incompatible package update. What is the error?
>
> For me it is aastex.cls not found.
Same here.
> Missing in TL 2015 but exists in TL 2014 and 2013.
> Under the aastex directory there is now aastex6.cls.
>
> > (Remember, we had the problem with missing character for luatex with the
> > aas_sample. A minimal example is:
> >
> > \documentclass[english]{article}
> > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
> > \usepackage[utf8]{luainputenc}
> > \usepackage{wasysym}
> >
> > \usepackage{babel}
> > \begin{document}
> > $M_{\sun}$,
> > \end{document}
> >
> > This works here with pdflatex but fails with luatex.
> >
> >
> > > 4509:TEMPLATES_export/templates/de_beamer-conference-ornate-20min_dvi3_systemF
> > > 4516:TEMPLATES_export/templates/de_beamer-conference-ornate-20min_pdf5_systemF
> > > 4524:TEMPLATES_export/templates/dinbrief_dvi3_systemF
> > > 4531:TEMPLATES_export/templates/dinbrief_pdf5_systemF
> >
> > Again, no analysis without error log.
>
> Package polyglossia Info: Making " an active character on input line 79.
> )
> Package polyglossia Info: Default language is german.
> (./de_beamer-conference-ornate-20min_pdf5_systemF.aux
> ! You can't use `\relax' after \the.
> <recently read> \l@german
I got this error also for the Intro German manual with pdf5_systemF.
> > > If you would like to run these tests to see if they pass/fail for you,
> > > you can run the following command:
> >
> ...
> >
> > I won't. My system uses debian/testing packages and I don't want to change
> > this as it is used for daily work.
>
> Why should you change? What is wrong with running a test without updating TL?
> I did not understand the meaning of Scotts question in that way.
I think Guenter's referring to the first part of the email, where I
indeed stated "I am interested in whether you also observe these tests
failing when you do a tlmgr update." I understand why Guenter might not
want to update to something that I'm claiming might break something.
I think I will wait a couple of days, update tlmgr again, check the TeX
Live mailing list, and only if things are still broken and not reported
I will take the time to investigate and report.
Thanks for reproducing, Kornel. It's good to know it is not something
system-specific. And thanks for being willing to diagnose, Guenter. At
this point, I'm not sure it's worth our time to investigate further. I
will keep an eye on the TeX Live mailing list and I will update again in
a couple of days to see if anything was fixed. If not and nothing was
reported, then I will look into it more.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
