On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 07:15:15PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 2. April 2016 18:48:12 MESZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > >On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:11:33AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > >> > >> I've found a solution for the strange crashes, strfwd.h must always > >included first, if not the compiler makes assumption which are wrong. > >> Now config.h for msvc2015 includes strfwd.h, not very nice but it > >solves the issue. > > > >Thank you for the fix. > > > >> So I think we could risk a msvc2015/Qt 5.6.0 release. > > > >I want to make sure I understand this statement. I interpret this to > >mean that it might not be crazy of us to do a MSVC2015/Qt 5.6.0 > >release. > > > >Or should I interpret it to mean that you now recommend a > >MSVC2015/Qt 5.6.0 release over a MSVC2010/Qt 5.5.1 release? > > > >Scott > > I recomment now the msvc2015/Qt5.6.0 build. I think the risk is minimal, sure > we drop the beta feedback, but I have the impression there was not much > feedback. And 5.6 has features which users will miss, especially on Win 10.
OK good to know. > And when we get horror feedback from the rc1 we could still go back. > > Btw, why are the betas and rcs not announced on the webpage? I should have put the beta announcements up. I will put the rc1 announcement when it's released. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
