Dear Georg, thank you for your feedback.
On 2016-04-03, Georg Baum wrote: > Concerning the list in section 2.2 I'd prefer it to stay simple. It > starts to become too complicated for my taste. There is too much > nesting, footnotes, and you have to read two times to understand how > the line "Modified layouts and modules with a" is to be parsed. I simplified it a bit in 77fc7fe (I Kept the nesting for "New valid value for an existing setting" to make clear that this are example cases.) > Finally, I'd also prefer it if this document is not used for indirect > communication. If you want to discuss whether a new language needs a file > format update, then we can do that on the list. I believe that this is one > of the cases whithout consensus, since this issue has been discussed in the > past IIRC. Yes. exchange of arguments should be on the list. (I kept a note that this point is under discussion - similar to what was in the "new layout" item before we decided to remove it from this list.) Feel free to edit - this is still work in progress. Günter
