On 04/08/2016 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:39:55AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: >>>> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>> Still, the noncontroversial patch for aastex was put on hold. >>> Please commit that. Thanks for the patch. >> Here is the complete patch. OK so? > It looks good. Thanks for updating the tests also. > > Please commit. > > If I remember correctly, we did not arrive to an agreement for what to name > the template file, right? In this example, we did not decide whether the > template for aastex6 should be aastex.lyx or aastex6.lyx? I am just asking > for my own memory, not that you should change it to aastex6.lyx.
In this case, since the class has a completely new name, it seems reasonable for the template to have that name, too. In the case where the class has the same name, but it's been updated, it seems reasonable for the template to keep the same name, and not to be versioned. Richard > > Scott
