On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:47:43PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 03/05/2016 06:09, Stephan Witt a écrit : > > Am 03.05.2016 um 03:04 schrieb Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org>: > > > > > > Le 03/05/2016 01:40, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 08:38:58AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > > > Am 01.05.2016 um 04:06 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 01:28:56PM +1200, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > > > > > On 1/05/2016 11:33 a.m., Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 27/04/2016 03:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : > > > > > > > > > Having just skimmed through an article on Wikipedia about > > > > > > > > > cedillas, I > > > > > > > > > gather a cedilla is never attached to the letter 'i'. > > > > > > > > > Nonetheless, when > > > > > > > > > I do attach one (using european.kmap, then ',' followed by > > > > > > > > > 'i'), > > > > > > > > > everything looks fine in the main LyX window but in the > > > > > > > > > Source Pane, LyX > > > > > > > > > format, the cedilla gets attached to the following letter. > > > > > > > > > For instance, > > > > > > > > > writing'aei̧ou' with a cedilla under the 'i', all is fine in > > > > > > > > > the main LyX > > > > > > > > > window (and the pdf) but when viewed in the Source Pane, the > > > > > > > > > cedilla is > > > > > > > > > located under the 'o'. A quick experiment suggests 'i' is the > > > > > > > > > only > > > > > > > > > letter for which this happens. It doesn't happen in 2.1.4 so > > > > > > > > > it appears > > > > > > > > > to be a (tiny) regression. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The source pane in under the responsability of Qt, AFAIK. It > > > > > > > > might be > > > > > > > > that you see a bug in Qt itself. What is the Qt version that > > > > > > > > your LyX > > > > > > > > uses? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JMarc > > > > > > > It's Uwe's windows version of rc1, hence Qt 5.6 as I understand. > > > > > > > (There > > > > > > > isn't anything about Qt version in the About LyX tabs. It would > > > > > > > be a good > > > > > > > addition to the information there.) > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought we did have it. In Help > About, for me it says: > > > > > > > > > > > > Qt Version (run-time): 5.6.0 > > > > > > Qt Version (compile-time): 5.6.0 > > > > > > > > > > This is visible for development version only. > > > > > > > > I see. Is the concern that we will confuse the user? Or that the > > > > information is useless because we should remember which Qt version was > > > > used for each release we provide? > > > > The idea was: it’s useful for developers only because one shouldn’t be > > unsure > > about the Qt-version of the released LyX package. But it’s easy to change > > and > > if in practice it’s interesting to know - why not. Patch is attached. > > > > > > > > Here, it is in About > Build Info in release mode. > > > > Yes, I was not precise enough. It depends on the location of the source tree > > in a git clone or not. > > > > Patch looks sensible and reasonable. > >
Doesn't seem like there is any disagreement. I would say commit. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
