On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 02:58:14PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 08/10/2016 02:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:11:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > >>> 2. The behavior of what happens seems to depend on the LaTeX class. I'm > >>> not sure about this, but in some cases, it seems that nothing is wrong > >>> with e.g. outputting the date after making the title. In other cases > >>> there is something wrong -- it doesn't show up and there is no LaTeX > >>> error. > >> Some document classes put \title and \author in the premable. In that > >> case, having them come after non-InTitle stuff won't affect the > >> output---the preamble material is collected during the validation > >> process---but you may still get the warning. > > Ah I see. > > > >> In principle, we could process all the InTitle material during > >> validation, or we could just collect a bunch of pointers to those > >> paragraphs, and process them together at the beginning of the output > >> process, or who knows what. Then you wouldn't have to worry about where > >> those things go. But it's not clear to me whether that is worth the effort. > > Indeed that seems like a lot of effort. What about making the error a GUI > > error? > > That's probably a good idea. The user may have no idea why the output > isn't correct.
OK. I will add this to my TODO list if no one else gets to it. Should it be an error or a warning? Kornel, after this discussion do you have any objection if I make further corrections like the one in this commit? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
