On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:23:13AM +0000, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 00.06.24 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [...] > > Thank you Scott for all distilling your experience as release manager, as > this > is important to improve the development process. :-) > > I will left the other issues that you have raised for others. > > > In case someone is craving wants more complexity, we can also discuss > > our view for the last point release of 2.2.x. For example, should all > > commits to the 2.3.x branch be backported to the 2.2.x branch? Or only > > critical patches and the lyx2lyx patch? > > Here I think that we should prioritize our efforts by going with the later > option, that is, the last 2.2.x should consist only of critical patches and > the lyx2lyx patch. This reduce the testing required and minimizes the need > for > an extra release if something slips under our radar, because by then we will > have three branches opened: 2.2.x; 2.3.x and 2.4.dev.
Makes sense. I guess in the end this is the decision of the branch maintainer. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
