On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:46:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 06/04/2017 à 05:05, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > To make sure I understand, you are against the attached patch because > > the changes are not as complicated as in the iconv case, right? > > No, I would be against the attached because it is wrong: what should be in > ifdef is the > if(){} else{} > and the comment above it. The patch does some code cleanup that is good in > any case.
Ah I see. > What I meant earlier is that I was lazy to do it and what not sure it would > worth the effort. But please have a go at it. OK. Actually, I will leave it be. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature