On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:46:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/04/2017 à 05:05, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > To make sure I understand, you are against the attached patch because
> > the changes are not as complicated as in the iconv case, right?
> 
> No, I would be against the attached because it is wrong: what should be in
> ifdef is the
>   if(){} else{}
> and the comment above it. The patch does some code cleanup that is good in
> any case.

Ah I see.

> What I meant earlier is that I was lazy to do it and what not sure it would
> worth the effort. But please have a go at it.

OK. Actually, I will leave it be.

Thanks,

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to