On 05/15/2017 06:20 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 May 2017 19.39.55 WEST Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> commit 0dd3311dd42996f9aede7d8c58b27937ebb48b54
>> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org>
>> Date:   Sat May 13 20:39:45 2017 +0200
>>
>>     rename buffer parameter math_number_before to math_numbering_side
>>
>>     this is a fileformat change
>>
>>     also try to fix an UI issue that JMarc gets
>>
>> +def convert_mathnumberingname(document):
>> +    " rename the \\math_number_before tag to \\math_numbering_side "
>> +    document.warning("Malformed LyX document: Missing '\\end_inset' of
>> Float inset.")
> As Guillaume suggested I think that this warning is incorrect. The function 
> does not check for insets since it works on the header and also this call is 
> unconditional...
>
>> +    regexp = re.compile(r'(\\math_number_before 1)')
>> +    i = find_re(document.header, regexp, 0)
>> +    if i != -1:
>> +        document.header[i] = "\\math_numbering_side left"
>> +    regexp = re.compile(r'(\\math_number_before 0)')
>> +    i = find_re(document.header, regexp, 0)
>> +    if i != -1:
>> +        document.header[i] = "\\math_numbering_side default"
>> +    # check if the document uses the class option "reqno"
>> +    k = find_token(document.header, "\\math_numbering_side", 0)
> This part of the code is OK:
>
>> +    regexp = re.compile(r'^.*reqno.*')
>> +    i = find_re(document.header, regexp, 0)
>> +    if i != -1:
>> +        document.header[k] = "\\math_numbering_side right"
>> +        # delete the found option
>> +        document.header[i] = document.header[i].replace(",reqno", "")
>> +        document.header[i] = document.header[i].replace(", reqno", "")
>> +        document.header[i] = document.header[i].replace("reqno,", "")
>> +        j = find_re(document.header, regexp, 0)
>> +        if i == j:
>> +            # then we have reqno as the only option
>> +            del document.header[i]
>> +
>> +
> My objection are on this part of the code. Basically we search for a 
> reference 
> to reqno in the lyx header, that in this case means the latex preamble or the 
> class options to equate the reqno reference to using the reqno option.
>
> It is very easy to produce a false positive by placing in the latex preamble 
> of the document:
>
> % it would be interesting to use reqno for all or some of the equations
>
> Just the mention of reqno is interpreted as transforming the document to use 
> the equation number on the right.
>
> IMHO we should left this option to the user as we do in all the other cases. 
> In this case that would mean removing the last part of the function.

I trust your judgement on this, José.

Richard

Reply via email to