On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 01:08:20AM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > Hi Scott, indeed there is no need for this in 2.3 and I meant to reply > to Jean-Marc later. In addition gcc 4.6 might get in the way and I am > hoping that 2.4 is the good time to unsupport it. So it's best not to > have this in 2.3.
Makes sense. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
