On 10/15/2017 06:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:41:52PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 10/15/2017 03:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 05:27:26PM +0000, Richard Heck wrote: >>> >>>> I propose to revert that commit in all branches pending a better >>>> solution. I don't think that will be >>>> too difficult to find. It's just a matter of doing the work. >>> Reverting in 2.2.x makes sense to me to be extra safe. As for 2.3.x, I >>> don't have a strong preference. It's up to you to decide the tradeoff >>> between the cost of a small delay and the cost of #9185 (both costs seem >>> small to me). From what I understand, the delay in undo only comes when >>> a BibTeX inset is involved, which I imagine is not very often. >> No, it comes whenever a document contains a BibTeX inset. A better patch >> would make it happen >> only when a BibTeX inset was involved. Then the delay is no surprise: Of >> course we have to reread >> the files. > Ah I see. I agree then that reverting in the other branches as well is a > good idea.
I have reverted all of them and added some comments to the bug, which is actually #9158 https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9158 Richard
