Re: style question

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| >     (*iterator).whatever
| > 
| > rather than :
| > 
| >     iterator->whatever
| > 
| > IMHO it's harder to type and read ...
| 
| I don't know. I use the latter...

Of course anotehr reason to use (*it).afd
is that this shows rather explicilty that you are doint some thing
special with it.

        Lgb