On 04/20/2018 03:35 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 20/04/2018 à 04:15, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >> I believe the attached should fix this. > > Do you really need to call updateMacros again? This is called > unconditionally a few lines above (and it is expensive).
I was intending to ask about that once Pavel confirmed it works otherwise. I don't know if it needs calling. I suspect not, but I've never been entirely clear about that routine. I don't think we need to call setChangesPresent either, but that is very cheap. It's the counter reset that's needed here. Riki
