On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 02:05:45AM +0000, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > You could just define a new method that does this and leave the old one > as is.
That is a good idea. Actually, it appears that this function definition is not used. But I think I will still not touch it and create a new function called "hasChange()". > > If that is not a correct approach, then I suppose that I need to check > > each paragraph on all levels myself. In this case, is there a way to > > iterate through all paragraphs and nested paragraphs of a selection? If > > there is not currently a way, would this be useful as a new helper > > method? > > There must be a good way to do this, but I do not know what it is. I think I can copy the approach in Paragraph::acceptChanges. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
