Am 22.09.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck <[email protected]>: > > On 09/22/2018 11:25 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Hi Riki, >> >> did you notice the problem report from Paola Manzini? It’s in mail archive >> here: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg206434.html >> >> We never had this problem and I wasn’t aware of the additional linker >> command line >> parameter -headerpad_max_install_names to avoid that error. >> >> I’ve used the lyx-2.3.1-2 tar archive again to build the binaries with it. >> The >> error was solved that way and I’ve uploaded the resulting package here: >> >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/9qu4ty07ama14mw/LyX-2.3.1-2%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg?dl=0 >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/iw36rl9st7kowlo/LyX-2.3.1-2%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg.sig?dl=0 >> >> What can be done with it? The error is serious and makes the tex2lyx in the >> original package useless. I propose to replace the wrong package with the >> new one. But is this an option? There is no visible difference between the >> two LyX versions. The About LyX info is not different, AFAICS. > > We routinely do this for the Windows build, so I think it is ok. But > maybe we should raise it on the list and see what people think? JMarc > and Jürgen especially.
Yes, we should. It did’t do it in the first place because of the download links - but now I think it doesn’t hurt. What do you think should be done here? Stephan >> Furthermore I’ve commited two changes to master I want to back port: >> d9c0807227a9bdff2d28a80181d0e7ec5532ba1e >> 28b84f5ddc42d2b4ec973b0abd4f8f3608952c61 >> >> They are for Mac OS builds only. Ok? > > OK. Thanks. Done.
