On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 05:55:09PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 28.12.2018, 11:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Indeed, the first problem seems to be a missing \cprotect here: > > > > \footnote{ASCII means \href{ > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII\#Character_set}{this set} > > > > I guess it is too complicated to output the \cprotect in ERT? Would > > it > > be easy for lyx2lyx to at least give a warning that compilation with > > 2.3.x is not expected to succeed because of missing \cprotect? > > I seem to remember we agreed that lyx2lyx would be too hard to do for > the cprotect thing. And indeed it would be very hard to track all > cases.
Makes sense for not adding ERT. But would it be easy to at least provide a warning from lyx2lyx? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature