On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:21 PM Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:21:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 07/01/2019 à 16:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > Le 07/01/2019 à 15:39, Elias M. Mariani a écrit : > > > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > > I would be interested to know what compiler errors you get. I'd rather > > > > > get rid of the long long things, than tweak the again. > > > > > > > > Great, I attach a log with the compilation error. > > > > > > Is it the only compilation error that you get? I am surprised.
There might be other compilation errors. > > > > > > Would it suffice to only rely on HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT and skip the part > > > that checks size? I don't know why you check the sizes in the first place. > > > > Now there is something I do not understand. Linux/amd64 does have long long, > > which is a 64bits type, like long. So what happens with OpenBSD that is so > > special? That size_t is a long long? I imagine that time_t is of size long on Linux ? > > Just bumping these questions. Elias, do you know the answers to JMarc's > questions above? > > Scott
