On 2019-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 16:45:29 CET schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net>: >> On 2019-02-16, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 22:57:53 CET schrieb Guenter Milde >> > <mi...@users.sf.net>: >> >> On 2019-02-15, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> > Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 06:47:00 CET schrieb Guenter Milde >> >> > <mi...@users.sf.net>:
>> > ... >> >> This leaves the following tests affected by my changes useSystemFonts.py: >> >> > Remaining tests now: >> >> > 1771 - export/doc/attic/eu_Customization_dvi3_systemF (Failed) >> >> > 1776 - export/doc/attic/eu_Customization_pdf4_systemF (Failed) >> >> > 1778 - export/doc/attic/eu_Customization_pdf5_systemF (Failed) I added eu_Customization with non-TeX fonts to the "ignoreLaTeXErrorTests" (missing_glyphs). (This is actually the only test in "attic" that fails with default (LM) non-TeX fonts.) As we still test * several Basque documents with all export formats * Customization.lyx in several languages with all export formats * attic/eu_Customization with tex fonts, I did not add a specific test for this special unmaintained legacy Basque document with non-TeX fonts. Aside: Instead, I suggest to add backwards-compatibility tests (check-load, lyx2lyx, and export (defaultoutput)) for a sample of documents from the original documentation (lib/doc, lib/templates, and lib/examples) of previous LyX versions. ... >> >> This would mean that some side-effect of my changes (that did not >> >> include changes to documents with lang == eu) changed the document from >> >> working to failing. It very much looks that my changes resulted in leaving default non-TeX fonts unchanged. As all affected tests are now handled, I commented out the font-selection-change code and run the *.systemF tests. The only failures I got are due to external ressources missing at my site (so I added lots of "unreliable.nonstandard" tags). Günter
