Le 13/06/2019 à 17:41, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
Last week while working with python2/python3 differences I found clues that
the legacy graphics conversion has problems.
Like I said in bugs #11457 and #11282:
"This also means that the legacy conversion has some issues but I think that
by now everyone should be using dvipng to that part of the code is not used."
I canot completely parse this sentence. s/to/so/? Something else?
So my question now is if we should, or not, make dvipng is a requirement for
the instant preview mode.
What do you think?
Could you remind us what the legacy route does? A good way to determine
whether it is still required is to remove it and see what happens ;)
JMarc
