On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:53:35AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:51:58AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Stealing the definition of the macro when we do not have it is the best > > solution IMO. > > I put in the patch with comments addressing both yours and Pavel's ideas > (to either wait until Qt 5.6.3 is required, or to copy the macro). It's > in at 19c41bd0.
If there is interest, I can work on a patch for using the macro. Should I condition on the Qt version and if it is less than 5.6.3 define the macro? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
