Am Sat, 18 Apr 2020 21:11:28 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt <[email protected]>:
> Am 18.04.2020 um 21:00 schrieb Kornel Benko <[email protected]>: > > > > Am Sat, 18 Apr 2020 20:11:01 +0200 > > schrieb Stephan Witt <[email protected]>: > > > >> Am 18.04.2020 um 15:58 schrieb Kornel Benko <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> Am Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:47:18 +0200 > >>> schrieb Stephan Witt <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>>> Am 18.04.2020 um 08:50 schrieb Kornel Benko <[email protected]>: ... > >> Yes, we could. But it doesn’t change anything, AFAICS. > > > > Good. > > It’s good that it changes nothing? :) Yes, because I did not want to change the behaviour for normal user. ... > > Using lyx2.3 Skim finds the correct lyxeditor, but if you use lyx2.4 it > > does not. > > Or vice versa. You are never on the really safe side. > > Why shouldn’t that work? I can install only one of the LyX versions at the > same time > at the „well known“ location. And then it works with the currently installed > one. If you use versioned lyx, you can install more than one version side by side. Are you saying, you never done it? > Again, I don’t see what the goal or use case of your change is. > > A developer should be able to modify the environment to fit the task to solve. > A user should be able to use it out-of-the-box w/o any trouble. +1 > > I would like to have nearly same handling for unix, Windows and MacOSX, > > that's why. > > That’s not possible anyway. True, but trying to unify most things is not wrong IMHO. > Stephan Kornel
pgppwVP0jozqV.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
