On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 03:44:56PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > So at this point I do not think that there anything that could/should be done > since that was a problem from the original file.
Ok, good then. > Another option is to add some kind of sane default where in the lyx_2_3.py we > add a blanket function to catch all those cases that for some reason were not > properly fixed before. > This problem should only apply to functions produced during a development > stage and the proposed solution would only apply to those cases. > > What do you think? Does not look necessary. We can always hiijack some other conversion routine ;) Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
