On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 09:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 01.08.2020, 03:26 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier:
> > @@ -627,7 +628,7 @@ void InsetCitation::latex(otexstream & os,
> > OutputParams const & runparams) const
> >
> > // check if we have to do a qualified list
> >
> > vector<docstring> keys =
> > getVectorFromString(cleanupWhitespace(key));
> >
> > bool const qualified = cs.hasQualifiedList
> >
> > - && (!getParam("pretextlist").empty()
> >
> > + && (!getParam("F").empty()
>
> I take it this went in by accident. In any case it is wrong and also
> causes an assertion. I'll revert it.
>
> Thibaut, if there is a rationale behind it, please let me know so we
> can figure out the correct way.
>
It may be due to an attempt to solve a problem when many references are
present in a single inset, but testing your code shows no regression on
bibliography_precooked_aastex
<https://github.com/cburschka/lyx/commit/fed71fa8c29b78de08f1678b31569e9348bbfeb7#diff-a24765c2fb0cd557caca67a5d5b2f58e>.
I suppose there was no real reason to correct it in the first place.
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
