On 11/11/20 9:36 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:05:12 -0500
schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:05:10PM +0100, Yuriy Skalko wrote:
commit 5a54ccfa87057fd3220d7193b40ac2dd37a9e6e1
Author: Yuriy Skalko <yuriy.ska...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Nov 4 11:27:08 2020 +0200
Improve structure of updateMacros
---
A git bisect suggests this commit broke the following ctest:
export/doc/es/Additional_xhtml
To reproduce manually, open the file lib/doc/es/Additional.lyx
and do File > Export > LyXHTML. On current master I get a SIGSEGV.
By the way, thank you for all of the cleaning up and refactoring work!
Scott
In /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/Buffer.cpp:3898
if (d->macro_lock)
SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
(gdb) p d
Cannot access memory at address 0x48
(gdb) p *this
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
(gdb) up
#1 0x00005555568a498d in lyx::InsetMathHull::preparePreview
(this=0x55555a673ce0,
pos=..., forexport=true) at
/usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/mathed/InsetMathHull.cpp:809
809 buffer->listMacroNames(macros);
(gdb) p macros
$1 = {<std::__debug::set<std::__cxx11::basic_string<wchar_t,
std::char_traits<wchar_t>,
std::allocator<wchar_t> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<wchar_t,
std::char_traits<wchar_t>, std::allocator<wchar_t> > >,
std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t>,
std::allocator<wchar_t> > > >> = std::__debug::set with 0 elements, <No data
fields>}
(gdb) p macros.size()
$2 = 0
(gdb)
I've reverted this commit. It's one case where using inset codes gets
the wrong result.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
