On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:48:45PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:16:49 -0500 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > > > > The next step from my side should be clang installation and debugging > > > > this patch there. But it can happen not very soon. > > > > > > It happened sooner than I expected. I've got Clang 11 from winlibs.com (it > > > uses libstdc++, unfortunately libc++ is not available here). It compiles > > > LyX > > > on Windows without any problems and the opening of the recent files > > > doesn't > > > crash. So the problem is definitely in libc++, as Jean-Marc suspected from > > > the start. > > > > I've tried to reproduce on Linux with Clang and libc++ but cannot. > > However, one thing that I do not understand is that in the output from > > ldd, both libstdc++.so.6 and libc++.so.1 show up. See attached. Is this > > expected? > > > > Scott > > I wonder if that may be a consequence of using DEBUG_GLIBC ...
Good idea. I thought I had turned that off but maybe I missed something. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
