On 2/15/21 5:51 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/02/2021 à 01:23, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
>> I'm no expert. I doubt it really matters very much, though maybe we
>> should settle on something, just for consistency. But it looks like
>> "uniform initializaton" is a thing, so maybe we should just get into
>> the habit of using {}. But I'd be happy to say as well: With plain
>> types, we use explicit initialization, e.g., 0 for ints; nullptr, for
>> pointers; etc. But we can use {} for the default with other types.
>
> I prefer this too.OK, sounds like a consensus. I'll add a note to Development.lyx. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
