On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 05:33:49PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > commit 635a7d77ddc94c63d52494dc4d68a930faccf45f > Author: Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> > Date: Mon Mar 15 17:09:09 2021 +0100 > > Allow compiling with Qt6 > > This commit allows compiling LyX with Qt6 when using autotools. > For a successful compilation the following 2 conditions must be met. > > 1) The Qt6 qmake has to come first in PATH, so that the command > "qmake -v | grep -o 'Qt version .'" returns "Qt version 6". > 2) The --enable-qt6 switch has to be passed to the configure command. > > If --enable-qt6 is used but Qt6 is not found, Qt5 is tried as a fallback. > If also Qt5 is not found, configuring for Qt4 is attempted. > If --enable-qt6 is not used, then things go as usual. This means that Qt5 > is tried first and then Qt4, unless --disable-qt5 is used, in which case > Qt4 is directly attempted. This means that existing scripts should > continue working unmodified. > > LyX should compile with Qt6 on windows and linux, and possibly also on > mac, but I could not test that. However, it is not guaranteed that it > works as it should. In particular I am not sure that I got right the > conversion from QRegExp to QRegularExpression. For sure, the syntax > highlighting seems to not work right. Someone in the know should take > a look at that. I am able to load documents and compile them but some > thourough testing is needed. However, when compiling for Qt5 or Qt4, > I tried to make sure that the functionality is preserved. > ---
Are there still QRegExp that need to be changed? I got an error from src/support/qstring_helpers.cpp. Also, why use #include <QtCore5Compat/QRegExp> in CategorizedCombo.cpp, but not other places? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
