On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:38:27AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 20 Jun 2021 05:54:24 +0200 (CEST) > schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > commit 37bce91a8be2273dd43d73088f97f87a4052af9b > > Author: Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > > Date: Sun Jun 20 00:05:42 2021 -0400 > > > > ctests: log a fixed LaTeX package issue (noweb) > > --- > > development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt | 6 ++++++ > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt > > b/development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt index 4f5be6f..c7b2e3c > > 100644 > > --- a/development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt > > +++ b/development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt > > @@ -48,3 +48,9 @@ Fix : 39a9e370 > > > > Report : > > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=20210528001413.56phju7dvfn4dexs%40tallinn > > Fix : ffa6a724 + > > + > > +Examples where upstream (e.g., LaTeX packages) bugs were fixed (more > > quickly) > > +because of ctests: > > + > > +Fix : https://github.com/nrnrnr/noweb/pull/12#event-4892099481 > > What about the "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" flag for ps2pdf? > This is first detected by ctest too, if I recall correctly.
Good idea, I agree. We should also add that the issue was subsequently reported here: https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12303 Knowing the time between when the ctests help detect something and when we would have discovered the issue from a different source (i.e., if there were no ctest coverage) is one way to evaluate how helpful the ctests are in an objective way. In this case, we only discovered the issue a couple of weeks before it was reported. Feel free to add that information to the file or I can add it tomorrow. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
