Am Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:44:18 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:55:10 -0500
> > schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
> >
> > > In the attached, if I do an advanced find with 2.4.04dev for $\coloneqq$,
> > > it is not
> > > found. If I then activate the branch, it is found. Is this a feature or a
> > > bug?
> > >
> > > Scott
> >
> > Feature, since exported latex does not contain these data, and we use
> > latex output as a search-source.
>
> Ah that makes sense. Indeed now I see that even LyX notes aren't
> searched.
>
> It feels a bit strange from a user perspective though since vanilla find
> does search in deactivated branches. Also, the user does not know the
> implementation (i.e., searching the LaTeX output). That said, it sounds
> like it would be complicated to ask for LaTeX output from all insets.
>
> Scott
Given the string 'ABCD' while 'B' is in deactivated branch.
Now considering the case searching for the word 'ACD'.
Should it be found?
Kornel
pgphtfOCSOgCW.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
