Am Mon, 20 Feb 2023 17:47:29 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>:
> Le 13/02/2023 à 21:29, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> >>> Indeed! So we should get rid of QRegexp now.
> >>
> >> Riki, would that be OK? What I have in mind is that whatever bug with
> >> this newer code will be found earlier if more users are running it.
> >
> > Yes, fine with me.
> >
> > I have been waiting to talk about next steps until we have some idea
> > what to do about the shortcut problem on OSX. That seems a large issue.
>
> This patch removes all traces of QRegExp. It will obviously need
> testing, but this is already the code used with Qt6.
>
> What I do not know is whether we can get rid of QtCore5Compat library.
> Is it useful for anything beyond QRegExp?
>
> JMarc
With CMake build I get
/usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/frontends/qt/GuiKeySymbol.cpp:28:10: fatal error:
QTextCodec:
No such file or directory 28 | #include <QTextCodec>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
if I remove the QtCore5Compat parts.
Kornel
pgp7QZDNzBVxM.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
