On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:52:13AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 20.07.2023 um 17:22 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I get the following failures now: > > > > export/examples/Modules/Linguistics_lyx22 (Failed) > > export/examples/Modules/Linguistics_lyx23 (Failed) > > export/examples/ja/Modules/Linguistics_lyx22 (Failed) > > export/examples/ja/Modules/Linguistics_lyx23 (Failed) > > > > I imagine the lyx2lyx after supporting new non-trivial features is > > tricky. Is it correct that these failures are now expected? > > No, there was a glitch in the reversion routine that showed off in this > specific constellation (with the deleted old gloss type in the > example). > > This is fixed now. > > A perfect roundtrip is not to be expected, as we revert to ERT and do > not convert back. But the documents should open and compile with > identical output.
Thanks, the tests are passing now. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
