On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 01:55:23AM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 19:46, Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 06:24:31PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > commit bf241165dd9b30b26e45b5fcbab0e2bd0d143b4c > > > Author: Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> > > > Date: Wed Sep 27 13:42:40 2023 -0400 > > > > > > ctest: invert es/Intro_docbook5 > > > > > > This fails after recent changes to the document. > > > --- > > > > Hi Thibaut, > > > > The es/Intro_docbook5 test is failing after changes to the document. I > > know some of these issues are very hard to add support for, so my plan > > is to just invert them when they happen and CC you so that you can > > decide whether it's worth spending time on or not. > > > > I'm attaching a patch that fixes the output from InsetInfo to match the > LaTeX output. This patch might be slightly controversial, since LyX 2.4 is > nearing the release; I made sure to touch the DocBook parts of the code > only to lower the risk of breakage.
> Also, I'm adding two much smaller patches: one that improves code > readability, one that fixes a bug about formatting and change tracking. Seems fine to me. Riki, is it OK with you if I commit Thibaut's patches to master? > I have manually checked that doc/es/Intro generates valid DocBook 5 (i.e. I > believe the test could be uninverted). Let me know if you find more issues! > > Could someone please check this in the Git repository? Thanks! The following test now fails: export/examples/Language_Support/Mixing_Japanese_with_other_Languages_%28with_CJKutf8%29_docbook5 Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
